Skip to content

Rolling EV Ratio: A Trend Indicator or Performance Measurement Statistic

June 2, 2010

Here is a super-simple but useful metric for strategy evaluation or just for mathematically defining the reward/risk for holding a stock or index at a given point in time.

Rolling EV Ratio=  cumulative W% (up periods/total periods) x W/L ratio (sum of wins/sum of losses)

The period length should be anywhere from 5-252 days, with shorter term periods showing mean-reversion and longer periods reflecting more stable estimates of reward/risk. Effectively the Rolling EV Ratio must be greater than .5 to have a positive edge, for example a 50% winning percentage with 1 to 1 odds is an even money proposition (50% x1=.5). Our goal is to have an EV that is as high as possible, but it is also worthwhile looking at changes in the distribution of the Rolling EV Ratio. In either case, the 252 day Rolling EV Ratio as applied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average tested over (gulp!) 20,000 bars  produced the following results when traded above .5 and exiting below .5:

DJIA 1929 to present (20,000 bars) CAGR Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio Rolling EV Ratio 5.80% 12.10% 0.478 Buy and Hold 5.10% 17.90% 0.286

Using the same indicator on the SPY produced strong results as well. In recent years the Rolling EV Ratio has been superior to the the 200ma, especially when used in a more “normalized” framework. There many  ways to apply this metric–it can be used first of all on a weekly, monthly or yearly time frame over a variety of period lengths to obtain a more complete picture. Secondly, it can be used to evaluate strategies as a means over turning systems on or off, or more importantly-to vary the allocation to a system. Finally, it can be used as a relative strength or momentum measure that has the benefit of overlooking volatile stocks in lieu of  preferring those that have the best combination of  consistency and reward to risk.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. George permalink
    June 2, 2010 2:41 am

    Hi David,
    For the Dow test you show, what was the lookback period? (5 or 252 days)
    Do you think that going short (instead of exiting below 0.5) would improve the CAGR even more?

  2. BMB permalink
    June 2, 2010 1:16 pm

    Hi David,
    Interesting post. I am most interested in using this metric as a rolling performance measure for turning systems on or off (or most likely, increasing or decreasing allocations). Specifically, I have been pondering a “meta-indicator” system that tracks a wide variety of indicators and combines their predictions into a single exposure (positive or negative) for the next day. These weighting of each indicator’s signal in the aggregate exposure would be based on a rolling measure of accuracy/profitability over various timeframes. Seems like the using EV for this makes sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: