Skip to content

Minimum Variance Algorithm (MVA) Excel Sheet

April 5, 2013

The link below contains a spreadsheet example for computing MVA weights from multiple times series. Next week, I will try to show some different applications.

Minimum Variance Algorithm

 

11 Comments leave one →
  1. stefan permalink
    April 5, 2013 4:15 am

    Thank you! It is easy and simpler than MCA.

    I tested it and indeed does as expected – reduces the portfolio volatility. I used an ETFs set as per Ray Dalio’s “All Weather” paper.

    I have a somewhat related question for you, in the same spirit of using simple heuristics to great leverage: have you considered adding a momentum component to the asset class weights calculation?

    So, MVA calculates weights inversely proportional with the average covariance and inversely proportional with asset class variance. But it could add also a normalized momentum component to the weights formula. I use some form of this and it improves results above what MVA alone does.
    I would be extremely interested on your thoughts on this topic.

    Again, thank you so much for your great content on this blog!

    • david varadi permalink*
      April 6, 2013 9:05 pm

      hi stefan, thank you. i have explored a lot of different avenues including the ones you suggested. I had planned to share them in subsequent posts down the line. you are correct that momentum helps to improve upon performance in that context. there are many ways to go in that direction for sure.
      best
      david

  2. Pierre permalink
    April 6, 2013 7:28 am

    I David,
    Thanks for sharing. Brilliant.

    • david varadi permalink*
      April 6, 2013 9:06 pm

      hi Pierre, hope you are well. thank you, and good work on the shiny application, just read about that will look into it further.
      best
      david

      • Pierre permalink
        April 7, 2013 8:11 am

        Hi David,
        I tested your MCA in connection with the Clusters/Risk Parity strategy you have developed and published with Michael. Substituting the risk parity for MCA does a perfect job in limiting the drawdown of the strategy. This helps avoiding UUP, which has a considerable drag on the long term performance of the strategy, and also has the inconvenience of not being a physical replication ETF.
        Thanks again,
        Best,
        Pierre

  3. Pierre permalink
    April 7, 2013 9:06 am

    Sorry, please read MVA instead of MCA

  4. david varadi permalink*
    April 8, 2013 11:52 pm

    hi Pierre, yes there are a lot of ways to use it, and incorporating it into clusters is also a useful application. this helps to capture the best of both worlds– a good correlation model and a means of lowering volatility/variance without excluding assets–thus preserving the clusters. good suggestion.
    best
    david

  5. Victor permalink
    May 20, 2013 1:52 am

    David, why weights (covar and inverse variance) being multiplied? Would it make sense to use a linear combination? This way other weights (momentum, as mentioned above) could be added and each method could be weighted into the final results.
    Also, it would be interesting to see how the weights change over time. How would dampening changes in the final weights affect risk & reward? My concern here is transaction costs, while dampened changes may be too slow to avoid increased risk.
    Neat stuff, thanks for sharing your ideas.

    Cheers,

    Victor

  6. stefan permalink
    May 27, 2013 6:52 pm

    David, I have one more question about the rationale for the heuristics you used here. The asset class variance shows up twice, both as a factor in the covariance and independently, while the correlation is present only once, as a covariance factor. Is there a rationale for the higher weight given the variance in this heuristics?

  7. Chad permalink
    May 30, 2013 10:09 am

    Hi David,

    Is MVA designed to approximate the Optimized Minimum Variance Portfolio? When I run an optimization in excel with the data from the MVA sheet I get very different results.

    Thanks

  8. Scott permalink
    April 25, 2014 12:00 am

    The excel sheet downloads the covariance formula as =_xlfn.COVARIANCE.S, which generates errors in excel 2007. Is there any practical difference in using =COVAR for the covariance calculations?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: